|
Qualcomm QCS2290 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Full comparison data of Qualcomm QCS2290 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy QCS2290 or Exynos 7 Octa 7884.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS2290 | 5% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 8% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS2290 | 70% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 57% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS2290 | 2% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | 5% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Total score | 70128 | 116251 | CPU | 19642 | 32549 | GPU | 26648 | 44170 | MEM | 11228 | 18591 | UX | 12627 | 20926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Single-Core | 181 | 337 | Multi-Core | 817 | 1046 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS2290 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 11 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1804 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 384 KB | L2 cache | | 512 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS2290 is 19% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCS2290 has 4 more core than Exynos 7 Octa 7884. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 702 | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 845 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 18.23 | 334 | # of Cores | | 18 | # of Shader Units | 768 | | Display | 1680 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 23.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.7 | 44.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 25.2 | 47.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 17.6 | 25.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 12.7 | 40.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.9 | 58.9 | Real Racing 3 | 32.5 | 82.8 | Sniper 3D | 56.6 | 61.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 31.3 | 66.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 28.4 | 75.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.9 | 66.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 25 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Dual ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | QCM2290 modem | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 120 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 60 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, GLONASS, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS2290 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 35 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS2290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|