Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884

Comparisons   03-12-2021
   Detailed testing data of Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Unisoc Tiger T616 or Exynos 7 Octa 7884.


 
Unisoc Tiger T616
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Unisoc Tiger T61611% Exynos 7 Octa 78848%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Unisoc Tiger T61668% Exynos 7 Octa 788457%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Unisoc Tiger T6168% Exynos 7 Octa 78845%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Unisoc Tiger T616 Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Total score154594116251
CPU4328532549
GPU5875444170
MEM2473918591
UX2782920926

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Unisoc Tiger T616 Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Single-Core264337
Multi-Core15081046

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Unisoc Tiger T616 Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Frequency2000 MHz1600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
6x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)9 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661866
Memory bandwidth3224
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache1 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.1-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Unisoc Tiger T616 is 19% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7884 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G71 MP18
GPU Frequency750 MHz546 MHz
GFloPS383.69334
# of Cores118
# of Shader Units
Display2160 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile23.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)29.544.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra45.447.3
Call of Duty: Mobile39.325.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)28.240.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition39.958.9
Real Racing 356.782.8
Sniper 3D72.261.5
Need for Speed No Limits72.266.2
Mortal Kombat X72.675.7
CSR Racing 259.766.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution64 MP28 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP28 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE-7LTE Cat.13 3CA
Download speed300 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T616 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 is better: 19
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Exynos 7 Octa 7884 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Kirin 710A
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Snapdragon 460
• Vs Exynos 9609
• Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Helio P70
• Vs Snapdragon 670
• Vs Snapdragon 665
• Vs Exynos 9611
• Vs Exynos 9610
• Vs Kirin 970
• Vs Helio P60
• Vs Helio P90
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Helio P95
• Vs Snapdragon 675
• Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Snapdragon 662
• Vs Snapdragon 710
• Vs Helio G70
• Vs Exynos 880
• Vs Snapdragon 712
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Helio G35
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs SC9863A
• Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 630
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands