Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 615 and Mali-T880 MP4.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio X25 (MT6797T) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Helio X25 (MT6797T) or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.


 
MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Helio X25 (MT6797T)6% Snapdragon 67010%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Helio X25 (MT6797T)41% Snapdragon 67066%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Helio X25 (MT6797T)5% Snapdragon 6708%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Helio X25 (MT6797T) Snapdragon 670
Total score93545151765
CPU2619642500
GPU3555357660
MEM1496024290
UX1683327322

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Helio X25 (MT6797T) Snapdragon 670
Single-Core242311
Multi-Core10891306

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Helio X25 (MT6797T) Snapdragon 670
Frequency2500 MHz2000 MHz
Cores108
Bit6464
Lithography20 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.55 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360
Power consumption (TDP)5 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR3 (Dual Channel)LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory4 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency8001866
Memory bandwidth1414.9
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X25 (MT6797T) is 19% better than Snapdragon 670 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X25 (MT6797T) has -2 more core than Snapdragon 670. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T880 MP4Adreno 615
GPU Frequency850 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS115.51448
# of Cores4
# of Shader Units256
Display2560 x 1600 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)19.827.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra34.954.7
Call of Duty: Mobile21.129.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)16.422.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition20.338.7
Real Racing 361.195.7
Sniper 3D66.3103.9
Need for Speed No Limits55.865.6
Mortal Kombat X55.871.1
CSR Racing 241.960.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution32 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGalileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 30
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Helio X25 (MT6797T) and Snapdragon 670, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Snapdragon 670 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290


Snapdragon 670 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands