|
Helio P40 vs Snapdragon 670 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P40 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and Adreno 615. This performance comparison involves two processors: Helio P40 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, GFXBench, Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Helio P40 or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P40 | 8% |
Snapdragon 670 | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P40 | 60% |
Snapdragon 670 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P40 | 6% |
Snapdragon 670 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P40 |
Snapdragon 670 | Total score | 119691 | 151765 | CPU | 33517 | 42500 | GPU | 45482 | 57660 | MEM | 19153 | 24290 | UX | 21542 | 27322 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P40 |
Snapdragon 670 | Single-Core | 244 | 311 | Multi-Core | 1077 | 1306 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P40 |
Snapdragon 670 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 615 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 161 | 448 | # of Cores | 3 | | # of Shader Units | | 256 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 24.9 | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 46.9 | 27.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 49.9 | 54.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 26.5 | 29.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 42.3 | 22.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 60.1 | 38.7 | Real Racing 3 | 99.8 | 95.7 | Sniper 3D | 109.8 | 103.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 69.9 | 65.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 79.8 | 71.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.9 | 60.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P40 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 20 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio P40 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36
Snapdragon 670 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
| |
|