HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G71 MP8 and Adreno 615.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 960 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 960 or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 960

Snapdragon 670

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 960

50%

Snapdragon 670

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 960

Snapdragon 670

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 960	Snapdragon 670
Total score	95769	151765
CPU	26819	42500
GPU	36393	57660
MEM	15324	24290
UX	17247	27322

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 960	Snapdragon 670
Single-Core	247	311
Multi-Core	1115	1306

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 960	Snapdragon 670
Frequency	2400 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1866
Memory bandwidth	28.8	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	64 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	4 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 960 is 16% better than Snapdragon 670 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP8	Adreno 615
GPU Frequency	1037 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	282	448
# of Cores	8
# of Shader Units		256
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.1	27.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	36.9	54.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	23.8	29.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	18.5	22.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	22.5	38.7
Real Racing 3	46.1	95.7
Sniper 3D	81.2	103.9
Need for Speed No Limits	51.7	65.6
Mortal Kombat X	59	71.1
CSR Racing 2	40.6	60.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution		16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 160
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 960 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 28
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Kirin 960 and Snapdragon 670, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 960 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 960 specs and review.

Snapdragon 670 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 670 specs and review.