|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 615 and Adreno 619L. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 480 5G is octa-core (Kryo 460) and Snapdragon 670 is octa-core (Kryo 360). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 480 5G or Snapdragon 670 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 480 5G | 19% |
Snapdragon 670 | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 480 5G | 76% |
Snapdragon 670 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 480 5G | 16% |
Snapdragon 670 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 480 5G |
Snapdragon 670 | Total score | 269743 | 151765 | CPU | 75537 | 42500 | GPU | 102495 | 57660 | MEM | 43157 | 24290 | UX | 48548 | 27322 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 480 5G |
Snapdragon 670 | Single-Core | 423 | 311 | Multi-Core | 1482 | 1306 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 480 5G |
Snapdragon 670 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 8 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 360 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 16 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 256 KB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 619L | Adreno 615 | GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 448 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 316 | 256 | Display | 2840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.2 | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 48.2 | 27.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 42.8 | 54.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.6 | 29.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 44.9 | 22.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 62.4 | 38.7 | Real Racing 3 | 64.2 | 95.7 | Sniper 3D | 81.3 | 103.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 68.5 | 65.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 62.1 | 71.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 47.1 | 60.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 24 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 25 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Qualcomm Spectra 160 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem | Download speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 800 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, SBAS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS (L1 and L5), GNSS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Sensor Assi | Galileo, Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, QZSS, GPS | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 is better: 8 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Snapdragon 480 5G and Snapdragon 670, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 480 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Snapdragon 670 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
| |
|