|
MediaTek MT6737H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6737H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T720 and Adreno 330. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 is quad-core (Krait 400). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MT6737H or Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6737H | 1% |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6737H | 30% |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | 20% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6737H | 1% |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6737H |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | Total score | 23870 | 33143 | CPU | 6687 | 9290 | GPU | 9070 | 12594 | MEM | 3827 | 5308 | UX | 4301 | 5955 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6737H |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | Single-Core | 63 | 88 | Multi-Core | 291 | 405 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6737H |
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 | Frequency | 1250 MHz | 2300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.3 GHz Krait 400 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR2, LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 640 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 is 45% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 | Adreno 330 | GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 450 MHz | GFloPS | 7.65 | 129 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.4 | 8.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.1 | 25.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.9 | 16.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 11.5 | 14.8 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.1 | 20.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.1 | 32.7 | Real Racing 3 | 16.1 | 29.6 | Sniper 3D | 20.6 | 22 | Need for Speed No Limits | 23.2 | 30.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 14.8 | 27 | CSR Racing 2 | 18.1 | 20.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | MPEG-4 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X4 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 is better: 30 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6737H and Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6737H SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|