MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT6739WW

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT6739WW, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8100 and Mali-T720.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6739WW is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Quadrant, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Octane V2, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MT6737H or MT6739WW and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6737H

MT6739WW

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6737H

30%

MT6739WW

29%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6737H

MT6739WW

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6737H	MT6739WW
Total score	23870	35685
CPU	6687	9986
GPU	9070	13560
MEM	3827	5708
UX	4301	6433

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6737H	MT6739WW
Single-Core	63	94
Multi-Core	291	436

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6737H	MT6739WW
Frequency	1250 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2, LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	640	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6739WW is 16% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720	PowerVR GE8100
GPU Frequency	450 MHz	570 MHz
GFloPS	7.65	11.2
# of Cores	1	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1440 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.4	11.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.1	28.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	12.9	18.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.5	15.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.1	24.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.1	36.8
Real Racing 3	16.1	37.2
Sniper 3D	20.6	29.8
Need for Speed No Limits	23.2	29.8
Mortal Kombat X	14.8	27
CSR Racing 2	18.1	22.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	MPEG-4	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation		GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WW is better: 24
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6737H and MT6739WW, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737H specs and review.

MT6739WW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WW specs and review.