Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Spreadtrum SC5735 vs MediaTek MT6737H benchmark which processor is better

Spreadtrum SC5735 vs MediaTek MT6737H

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Spreadtrum SC5735 vs MediaTek MT6737H, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-400 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Spreadtrum SC5735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Octane V2, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, and how good the chips are in games Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Spreadtrum SC5735 or MT6737H and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

 
Spreadtrum SC5735
MediaTek MT6737H

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Spreadtrum SC57351% MT6737H1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Spreadtrum SC573524% MT6737H30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Spreadtrum SC57351% MT6737H1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Spreadtrum SC5735 MT6737H
Total score1940823870
CPU54296687
GPU73839070
MEM31103827
UX34854301

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Spreadtrum SC5735 MT6737H
Single-Core5163
Multi-Core237291

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Spreadtrum SC5735 MT6737H
Frequency1200 MHz1250 MHz
Cores44
Bit3264
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory1 Gb3 Gb
Memory Frequency266640
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6737H is 4% better than Spreadtrum SC5735 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP2Mali-T720
GPU Frequency400 MHz450 MHz
GFloPS8.47.65
# of Cores21
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.16.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)15.218.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra9.112.9
Call of Duty: Mobile8.911.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)12.615.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition19.323.1
Real Racing 311.416.1
Sniper 3D17.320.6
Need for Speed No Limits14.623.2
Mortal Kombat X13.214.8
CSR Racing 211.818.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDHD
Codec supportH.264 MPEG-4


Networks and Navigation
ModemTD-SCDMA/GGE
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC5735 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 28
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Spreadtrum SC5735 and MT6737H, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


MT6737H SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands