Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT8783 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT8783

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6737H vs MediaTek MT8783, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-T720 MP3.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8783 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like AnTuTu 8, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the chips are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MT6737H or MT8783 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

 
MediaTek MT6737H
MediaTek MT8783

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT6737H1% MT87832%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6737H30% MT878326%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT6737H1% MT87831%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6737H MT8783
Total score2387029291
CPU66878194
GPU907011135
MEM38274686
UX43015273

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6737H MT8783
Single-Core6377
Multi-Core291358

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6737H MT8783
Frequency1250 MHz1300 MHz
Cores48
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2, LPDDR3LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory3 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency640800
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8783 is 3% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6737H has 4 more core than MT8783. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720Mali-T720 MP3
GPU Frequency450 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS7.6535.7
# of Cores13
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 720 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile6.48.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)18.122.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra12.914.8
Call of Duty: Mobile11.513.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.118.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition23.129.6
Real Racing 316.122.2
Sniper 3D20.632.6
Need for Speed No Limits23.226.6
Mortal Kombat X14.817
CSR Racing 218.119.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec support MPEG-4H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Download speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8783 is better: 29
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MT8783 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT6737H SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731


MT8783 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands