|
MediaTek MT6737H vs Spreadtrum SC9832A |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6737H vs Spreadtrum SC9832A, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-400 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Spreadtrum SC9832A is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of processors in Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy MT6737H or Spreadtrum SC9832A and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6737H | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6737H | 30% |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | 32% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6737H | 1% |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6737H |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | Total score | 23870 | 23339 | CPU | 6687 | 6527 | GPU | 9070 | 8868 | MEM | 3827 | 3735 | UX | 4301 | 4211 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6737H |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | Single-Core | 63 | 62 | Multi-Core | 291 | 285 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6737H |
Spreadtrum SC9832A | Frequency | 1250 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2, LPDDR3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 640 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9832A is 3% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 | Mali-400 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 7.65 | 8.4 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.4 | 4.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.1 | 16.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.9 | 10.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 11.5 | 9.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.1 | 13.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.1 | 21.5 | Real Racing 3 | 16.1 | 21 | Sniper 3D | 20.6 | 13.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 23.2 | 16.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 14.8 | 16.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 18.1 | 14.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat4 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832A is better: 8 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6737H and Spreadtrum SC9832A, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6737H SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
Spreadtrum SC9832A SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|