MediaTek MT6732 vs MediaTek MT6737H

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6732 vs MediaTek MT6737H, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Mali-T720.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6732 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, Octane V2, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, and how good the chipsets are in games Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6732 or MT6737H and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6732

MT6737H

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6732

23%

MT6737H

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6732

MT6737H

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6732	MT6737H
Total score	33768	23870
CPU	9445	6687
GPU	12832	9070
MEM	5410	3827
UX	6088	4301

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6732	MT6737H
Single-Core	89	63
Multi-Core	412	291

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6732	MT6737H
Frequency	1500 MHz	1250 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	640
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6732 is 16% better than MT6737H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP2	Mali-T720
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	450 MHz
GFloPS	47.6	7.65
# of Cores	2	1
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	10.4	6.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.5	18.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.3	12.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.6	11.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.6	15.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	34.3	23.1
Real Racing 3	22.9	16.1
Sniper 3D	34.8	20.6
Need for Speed No Limits	32.9	23.2
Mortal Kombat X	26.5	14.8
CSR Racing 2	23.8	18.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 0
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6732 and MT6737H, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6732 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6732 specs and review.

MT6737H SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6737H specs and review.