|
MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6737H |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6737H, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737H is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy MT6735T or MT6737H and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6735T |
MT6737H | Total score | 23688 | 23870 | CPU | 6630 | 6687 | GPU | 8997 | 9070 | MEM | 3787 | 3827 | UX | 4266 | 4301 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6735T |
MT6737H | Single-Core | 62 | 63 | Multi-Core | 289 | 291 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6735T |
MT6737H | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR2, LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 3 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 640 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6737H is 19% better than MT6735T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-T720 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 450 MHz | GFloPS | 20.4 | 7.65 | # of Cores | 2 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.9 | 6.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.2 | 18.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.7 | 12.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 11.9 | 11.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.3 | 15.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.3 | 23.1 | Real Racing 3 | 22.2 | 16.1 | Sniper 3D | 20.3 | 20.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 17.8 | 23.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 18.4 | 14.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 15.2 | 18.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | HD | Codec support | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735T is better: 14
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737H is better: 12 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6735T and MT6737H, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6735T SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
MT6737H SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
| |
|