Comparisons 14-05-2021
Full compare data of Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, Geekbench 5, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy M1 or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | M1 |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 1204017 | 698731 | | CPU | 179367 | 222644 | | GPU | 371998 | 234492 | | MEM | 95242 | 130499 | | UX | 75217 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | M1 |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 1807 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 7691 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | M1 |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 16000 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2666 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 48 KB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 90% better than Kirin 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Apple M1 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 3200 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 2600 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 8 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 24 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X80 5G | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
