Comparisons 11-03-2021
So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1000C vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G78 MP24 and Mali-G57 MP5.
This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1000C is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Kirin 9000 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench 5, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1000C or Kirin 9000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 1000C | 83% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 1000C | 72% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 1000C | 77% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1000C |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 430976 | 698731 | | CPU | 139771 | 222644 | | GPU | 119922 | 234492 | | MEM | 91505 | 130499 | | UX | 79700 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1000C |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 923 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 3047 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1000C |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 29.87 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1000C is 84% better than Kirin 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 705.5 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 5 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 27.1 | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.6 | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 57.3 | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 41.8 | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 46.9 | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 76.6 | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | 86 | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | 74.5 | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 68.8 | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | 83.1 | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | 63 | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 64 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 4600 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000C is better: 11
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 25
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000C
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
