Comparisons 14-05-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Mediatek Dimensity 900 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Dimensity 900 or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 900 | 81% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 900 | 73% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 900 | 74% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 900 |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 489934 | 698731 | | CPU | 135989 | 222644 | | GPU | 116434 | 234492 | | MEM | 88895 | 130499 | | UX | 77760 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 900 |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 1049 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 3464 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 900 |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 900 is 87% better than Kirin 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 684 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 24 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 900 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 29
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
