Comparisons 27-08-2021
Full compare data of Mediatek Dimensity 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy Mediatek Dimensity 810 or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 68% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 72% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Mediatek Dimensity 810 | 66% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 400983 | 698731 | | CPU | 110206 | 222644 | | GPU | 94592 | 234492 | | MEM | 71802 | 130499 | | UX | 62662 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 898 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 3054 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3130 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 23% better than Mediatek Dimensity 810 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 486 | 1076 | | # of Cores | 2 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 64 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1250 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 810 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 33
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
