Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G77 MC9 and Mali-G78 MP24.
This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 9000 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Dimensity 1000 Plus is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 9000 or Dimensity 1000 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 90% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 69% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 84% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Total score | 698731 | 502425 | | CPU | 222644 | 163368 | | GPU | 234492 | 139627 | | MEM | 130499 | 106600 | | UX | 110815 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Single-Core | 1023 | 1069 | | Multi-Core | 3714 | 3316 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Frequency | 313 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 29.87 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1000 Plus is 87% better than Kirin 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1076 | 504 | | # of Cores | 24 | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 27.3 | 30.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 83.9 | 44.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 50.6 | 57.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 46.4 | 54.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 71.3 | 36.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 103.1 | 57.3 | | Real Racing 3 | 88.6 | 115.4 | | Sniper 3D | 65.8 | 109.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 60.7 | 80.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | 65.8 | 92.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | 60.7 | 69.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 128 MP | 80 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Balong 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
|
