Comparisons 21-06-2021 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 9000 | Total score | 897135 | 698731 | CPU | 268491 | 222644 | GPU | 334895 | 234492 | MEM | 153388 | 130499 | UX | 139755 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 9000 | Single-Core | 1251 | 1023 | Multi-Core | 3945 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 9000 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3130 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 44 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 4% better than Snapdragon 888 Pro in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP24 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 1486 | 1076 | # of Cores | | 24 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 128 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Balong 5G | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 18
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 17 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • 3DMark • Antutu 8 • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|