Comparisons 01-08-2021
Full compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 or Kirin 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 | 61% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 | 81% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 | 56% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 |
Kirin 9000 | | Total score | 372638 | 698731 | | CPU | 89076 | 222644 | | GPU | 111104 | 234492 | | MEM | 50888 | 130499 | | UX | 46486 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 |
Kirin 9000 | | Single-Core | 778 | 1023 | | Multi-Core | 2952 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 |
Kirin 9000 | | Frequency | 2840 MHz | 3130 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.84 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 384 KB | | | L2 cache | 768 KB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 9% better than Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 690 | Mali-G78 MP24 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 740 | 1076 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 27.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 83.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 50.6 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 46.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 71.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 103.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 88.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 65.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 60.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 65.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 60.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 32 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 390 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE modem | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
