 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7352 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7352 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Gears 5, AIDA64, WPrime, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Furmark, 7zip, Handbrake, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7352 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7352 is 8% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
EPYC 7352 | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 104.6 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 118.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 66.6 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 111.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 89.2 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 96.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 82.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 59.4 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 92.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 99.9 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 98.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7352 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 113 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 5016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 10641 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 554 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 27682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 388 | 1805 | | Multi-Core | 26159 | 40609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1323 | 962 | | Multi-Core | 24668 | 16287 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 24 | | Threads | 20 | 48 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 155 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Silver 4410T is 14% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7352 has 14 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 10
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and AMD EPYC 7352 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
