|
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs Intel Xeon W-2235 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs Intel Xeon W-2235 and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, RealBench, 7zip, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-2235 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
Xeon W-2235 | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4410T is 5% better than Xeon W-2235. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
Xeon W-2235 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 94.9 | Valorant | 128.6 | 107.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 60.4 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 101.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 80.9 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 87.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 74.4 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 53.9 | Warzone | 100.3 | 84.1 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 90.6 | Valheim | 106.7 | 89.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
Xeon W-2235 | 31% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon W-2235 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Silver 4410T since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 130W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 206 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 1514 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 188 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 5853 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 502 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 14141 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Single-Core | 388 | 2638 | Multi-Core | 26159 | 14394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Single-Core | 1323 | 1210 | Multi-Core | 24668 | 6788 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon W-2235 | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 4130 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 130 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 2933 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 93.85 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 8.25 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-2235 is 28% better than Xeon Silver 4410T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4410T has 4 more core than Xeon W-2235. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-2235 is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and Intel Xeon W-2235 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon W-2235 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|