 |
AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 7352 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7552 vs AMD EPYC 7352 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, MATLAB, PassMark, RealBench, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, WPrime, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7352 or AMD EPYC 7552.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7552 | 72% |
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7552 is 13% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7552 | 77% |
EPYC 7352 | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 137.0 | 104.6 | | Valorant | 155.7 | 118.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 87.2 | 66.6 | | Apex Legends | 146.3 | 111.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 116.8 | 89.2 | | Overwatch | 126.1 | 96.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 107.4 | 82.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 77.8 | 59.4 | | Warzone | 121.4 | 92.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 130.8 | 99.9 | | Valheim | 129.2 | 98.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7552 | 18% |
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7352 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7552 as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 113 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8977 | 5016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 528 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19032 | 10641 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1001 | 554 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49501 | 27682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 2844 | 1805 | | Multi-Core | 72727 | 40609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1082 | 962 | | Multi-Core | 48030 | 16287 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7552 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2.2 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 24 | | Threads | 96 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 155 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 192MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000076
100-100000076WOF | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7352 is 4% better than EPYC 7552 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7552 has 24 more core than EPYC 7352. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7552 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 3
Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7552 and AMD EPYC 7352 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7552 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
