 |
AMD EPYC 7352 vs Intel Xeon E-2234 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7352 vs Intel Xeon E-2234 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Blender, PassMark, Handbrake, WPrime, AIDA64, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E-2234 or AMD EPYC 7352.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7352 | 62% |
Xeon E-2234 | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7352 is 16% better than Xeon E-2234. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7352 | 59% |
Xeon E-2234 | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 104.6 | 93.6 | | Valorant | 118.9 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.6 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 111.7 | 100.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.2 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 96.3 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.0 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 92.7 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 99.9 | 89.3 | | Valheim | 98.7 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7352 | 20% |
Xeon E-2234 | 61% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon E-2234 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7352 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 71W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 113 | 221 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5016 | 686 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 476 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10641 | 1671 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 554 | 335 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27682 | 9453 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | | Single-Core | 1805 | 2945 | | Multi-Core | 40609 | 9621 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | | Single-Core | 962 | 1300 | | Multi-Core | 16287 | 5490 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7352 |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Rome | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 4 | | Threads | 48 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 28500 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 71 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon E-2234 is 36% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7352 has 20 more core than Xeon E-2234. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E-2234 is better: 13
However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7352 and Intel Xeon E-2234 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon E-2234 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
