 |
AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 7352 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 7352 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, 3DMark, SuperPi, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Prime95, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, 7zip, RealBench, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7352 or AMD EPYC 7542.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7542 | 67% |
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7542 is 7% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7542 | 76% |
EPYC 7352 | 59% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.8 | 104.6 | | Valorant | 153.2 | 118.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 66.6 | | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 111.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 89.2 | | Overwatch | 124.1 | 96.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 82.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 59.4 | | Warzone | 119.5 | 92.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 99.9 | | Valheim | 127.1 | 98.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7542 | 16% |
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7352 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7542 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 174 | 113 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7016 | 5016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 419 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14867 | 10641 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 789 | 554 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38654 | 27682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 2227 | 1805 | | Multi-Core | 56789 | 40609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1098 | 962 | | Multi-Core | 45863 | 16287 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 24 | | Threads | 64 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 155 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000075
100-100000075WOF | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 20% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7542 has 8 more core than EPYC 7352. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 2
All the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7542 and AMD EPYC 7352 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
