 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7262 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7262 and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, 7zip, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, WPrime, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7262 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
EPYC 7262 | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4410T is 1% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
EPYC 7262 | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
EPYC 7262 | 22% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7262 since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 199 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 1922 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 398 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 4212 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 1148 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 11721 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Single-Core | 388 | 1915 | | Multi-Core | 26159 | 21190 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Single-Core | 1323 | 1037 | | Multi-Core | 24668 | 13124 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7262 | | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 155 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000041
100-100000041WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7262 is 15% better than Xeon Silver 4410T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4410T has 2 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 4
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and AMD EPYC 7262 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
