 |
AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7F52 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, Blender, 7zip, RealBench, SuperPi, Gears 5, Furmark, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, MATLAB, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 7352.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7352 | 62% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F52 is 1% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7352 | 59% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 104.6 | 113.4 | | Valorant | 118.9 | 128.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.6 | 72.2 | | Apex Legends | 111.7 | 121.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.2 | 96.7 | | Overwatch | 96.3 | 104.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.0 | 88.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 64.4 | | Warzone | 92.7 | 100.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 99.9 | 108.3 | | Valheim | 98.7 | 107.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7352 | 20% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7352 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F52 as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 113 | 123 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5016 | 5347 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 236 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10641 | 11340 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 554 | 593 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27682 | 29500 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1805 | 1342 | | Multi-Core | 40609 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 962 | 1253 | | Multi-Core | 16287 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 16 | | Threads | 48 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF | 100-000000140
100-000000140WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 34% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7352 has 8 more core than EPYC 7F52. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 25
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7352 and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
