|
AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7443 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7443 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like RealBench, Furmark, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7443 or AMD EPYC 7352.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7443 is 3% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7352 | 59% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Control, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.6 | 113.3 | Valorant | 118.9 | 128.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.6 | 72.1 | Apex Legends | 111.7 | 121.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.2 | 96.6 | Overwatch | 96.3 | 104.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.0 | 88.9 | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 64.4 | Warzone | 92.7 | 100.5 | Assassin's Creed | 99.9 | 108.2 | Valheim | 98.7 | 106.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
EPYC 7443 | 22% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7352 as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 113 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5016 | 6075 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 276 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10641 | 12876 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 554 | 680 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27682 | 33481 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 1805 | 1530 | Multi-Core | 40609 | 49112 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 962 | 1354 | Multi-Core | 16287 | 24852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.85 MHz | Cores | 24 | 24 | Threads | 48 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 62000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 200 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000077 100-100000077WOF | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7443 is 19% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 25 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7352 and AMD EPYC 7443 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7443 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|