Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 9354P gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 9354P

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 9354P tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as WPrime, AIDA64, Furmark, 7zip, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, PassMark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Borderlands 3
  • Death Stranding
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Apex Legends
  • Halo Infinite
  • Fallout 76
  • Overwatch
  • Valorant
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Fortnite
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Valheim
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Last Man Standing

   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354P or AMD EPYC 7352.


 
AMD EPYC 7352
AMD EPYC 9354P

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 735262% EPYC 9354P70%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9354P is 11% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 735259% EPYC 9354P75%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite104.6132.6
Valorant118.9150.6
Cyberpunk 207766.684.4
Apex Legends111.7141.6
Call of Duty Warzone89.2113.0
Overwatch96.3122.0
Red Dead Redemption 282.0103.9
DOOM Eternal59.475.3
Warzone92.7117.5
Assassin's Creed99.9126.5
Valheim98.7125.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 735220% EPYC 9354P26%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7352 as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 9354P
Cinbench 15 Single-core113170
Cinbench 15 Multi-core50168374
Cinbench 20 Single-core388350
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1064117783
Cinbench 23 Single-core554911
Cinbench 23 Multi-core2768246297

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 9354P
Single-Core18052087
Multi-Core4060967926

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 9354P
Single-Core9622223
Multi-Core1628743685

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7352 AMD EPYC 9354P
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2019November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.2 MHz3.8 MHz
Frequency2.3 MHz3.25 MHz
Cores2432
Threads4864
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count56000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)155 W280 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth204 GByte/s460.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache128MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-000000077
100-100000077WOF
100-000000805
100-100000805WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354P is 29% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9354P has 8 more core than EPYC 7352. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 33
   Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7352 and AMD EPYC 9354P before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7352 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9354P - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands