|
AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7313 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 7313 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, RealBench, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Prime95, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, SuperPi. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or AMD EPYC 7352.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
EPYC 7313 | 62% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7352 | 59% |
EPYC 7313 | 68% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.6 | 120.0 | Valorant | 118.9 | 136.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.6 | 76.4 | Apex Legends | 111.7 | 128.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.2 | 102.3 | Overwatch | 96.3 | 110.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.0 | 94.1 | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 68.2 | Warzone | 92.7 | 106.4 | Assassin's Creed | 99.9 | 114.6 | Valheim | 98.7 | 113.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
EPYC 7313 | 30% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7352 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 113 | 124 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5016 | 5029 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 229 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10641 | 10661 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 554 | 564 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27682 | 27719 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 1805 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 40609 | 40658 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 962 | 1399 | Multi-Core | 16287 | 31411 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 24 | 16 | Threads | 48 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 155 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000077 100-100000077WOF | 100-000000329 100-100000329WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313 is 23% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7352 has 8 more core than EPYC 7313. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7352 and AMD EPYC 7313 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7313 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|