 |
AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 9554 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7352 vs AMD EPYC 9554 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as AIDA64, VeraCrypt, RealBench, PCMark 10, Blender, 3DMark, Blender, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, Prime95, Furmark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554 or AMD EPYC 7352.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7352 | 62% |
EPYC 9554 | 87% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554 is 28% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7352 | 59% |
EPYC 9554 | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 104.6 | 155.8 | | Valorant | 118.9 | 177.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.6 | 99.2 | | Apex Legends | 111.7 | 166.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 89.2 | 132.8 | | Overwatch | 96.3 | 143.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 82.0 | 122.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 59.4 | 88.5 | | Warzone | 92.7 | 138.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 99.9 | 148.7 | | Valheim | 98.7 | 147.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7352 | 20% |
EPYC 9554 | 14% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7352 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 113 | 380 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5016 | 15365 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 708 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10641 | 32559 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 554 | 1726 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27682 | 84655 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 1805 | 3630 | | Multi-Core | 40609 | 124178 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 962 | 1560 | | Multi-Core | 16287 | 66486 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7352 |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 64 | | Threads | 48 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 56000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF | 100-000000790
100-100000790WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554 is 25% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554 has 40 more core than EPYC 7352. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554 is better: 33
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7352 and AMD EPYC 9554 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9554 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
