|
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7313 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs AMD EPYC 7313 and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, Handbrake, 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Prime95, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB. Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
EPYC 7313 | 62% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7313 is 8% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
EPYC 7313 | 68% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 120.0 | Valorant | 128.6 | 136.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 76.4 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 128.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 102.3 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 110.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 94.1 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 68.2 | Warzone | 100.3 | 106.4 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 114.6 | Valheim | 106.7 | 113.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
EPYC 7313 | 30% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Silver 4410T as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 155W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 124 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 5029 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 229 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 10661 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 564 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 27719 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 388 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 26159 | 40658 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Single-Core | 1323 | 1399 | Multi-Core | 24668 | 31411 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
AMD EPYC 7313 | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 155 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000329 100-100000329WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313 is 9% better than Xeon Silver 4410T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7313 has 6 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and AMD EPYC 7313 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7313 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|