 |
AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7352 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7473X vs AMD EPYC 7352 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as RealBench, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, Furmark, 7zip, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7352 or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7473X | 67% |
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 7% better than EPYC 7352. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7473X | 74% |
EPYC 7352 | 59% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 130.7 | 104.6 | | Valorant | 148.5 | 118.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 66.6 | | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 111.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 89.2 | | Overwatch | 120.3 | 96.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 82.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 59.4 | | Warzone | 115.8 | 92.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 99.9 | | Valheim | 123.3 | 98.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7473X | 20% |
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 113 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 5016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 10641 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 554 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 27682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1812 | 1805 | | Multi-Core | 58245 | 40609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1489 | 962 | | Multi-Core | 41864 | 16287 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 24 | | Threads | 48 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 155 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000507
100-000000507​WOF | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7473X is 17% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 3
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7473X and AMD EPYC 7352 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
