 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Blender, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Prime95, Handbrake, PassMark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Silver 4410T or Intel Xeon Gold 5416S.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 64% |
Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 5416S is 10% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5416S | 66% |
Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 116.9 | 113.2 | | Valorant | 132.8 | 128.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 74.4 | 72.0 | | Apex Legends | 124.9 | 120.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 99.6 | 96.4 | | Overwatch | 107.6 | 104.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91.7 | 88.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 66.4 | 64.3 | | Warzone | 103.6 | 100.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 111.6 | 108.0 | | Valheim | 110.2 | 106.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5416S | 26% |
Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5416S since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 150W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1024 | 509 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3295 | 2388 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2267 | 1223 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8125 | 5323 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1579 | 3011 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46229 | 13359 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T | | Single-Core | 14358 | 388 | | Multi-Core | 47058 | 26159 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T | | Single-Core | 1186 | 1323 | | Multi-Core | 28321 | 24668 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T | | Announcement date | March 24, 2023 | March 14, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.7 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 10 | | Threads | 32 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 36000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 150 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 26.25 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Silver 4410T is 25% better than Xeon Gold 5416S in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 5416S has 6 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 3
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 5416S and Intel Xeon Silver 4410T before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
