 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410T vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like WPrime, Gears 5, RealBench, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Blender, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or Intel Xeon Silver 4410T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6248R is 6% better than Xeon Silver 4410T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410T | 64% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 124.8 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 141.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 79.4 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 133.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 106.4 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 114.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 97.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 70.9 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 110.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 119.1 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 117.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410T | 29% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410T is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6248R as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 509 | 226 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2388 | 6636 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1223 | 426 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5323 | 10753 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3011 | 1080 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13359 | 27371 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | | Single-Core | 388 | 2247 | | Multi-Core | 26159 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | | Single-Core | 1323 | 990 | | Multi-Core | 24668 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410T |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | | Announcement date | March 14, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA3647 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Cascade Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.7 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 24 | | Threads | 20 | 48 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 7510 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 205 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 1 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 26.25 MB | 35.75 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6248R is 9% better than Xeon Silver 4410T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6248R has 14 more core than Xeon Silver 4410T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410T is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 21
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4410T and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
