 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7502 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7502 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Prime95, WPrime, PassMark, 7zip, RealBench, Furmark, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 7502 | 66% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7502 is 1% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 7502 | 73% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 129.9 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 147.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 82.7 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 138.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 110.7 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 119.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 101.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 73.8 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 115.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 124.0 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 122.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 7502 | 17% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7502 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H as it consumes less power: 270W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 160 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 6608 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 391 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 14007 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 740 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 36424 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | | Single-Core | 15433 | 2094 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 53430 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | | Single-Core | 1270 | 939 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 41117 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7502 | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 32 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 180 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000054
100-100000054WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 13% better than EPYC 7502 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7502 has 16 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 14
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7502 is better: 20
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 7502 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7502 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
