 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 9354 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 9354 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Blender, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Gears 5, AIDA64, Handbrake, PCMark 10, RealBench, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 9354 | 70% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9354 is 7% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 9354 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Control, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 133.0 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 151.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 84.6 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 142.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 113.4 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 122.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 104.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 75.6 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 117.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 127.0 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 125.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 9354 | 26% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H since it has less power consumption: 270W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9354 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 165 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 8452 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 346 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 17956 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 913 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 46758 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9354 | | Single-Core | 15433 | 2101 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 68605 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9354 | | Single-Core | 1270 | 2238 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 44119 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 9354 | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.25 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 32 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 280 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000798
100-100000798WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354 is 10% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9354 has 16 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354 is better: 23
Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 9354 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9354 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
