 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like SuperPi, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Handbrake, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, RealBench, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 52% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Platinum 8444H is 20% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 102.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 88.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 54.6 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 90.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
Xeon Bronze 3408U | 20% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Bronze 3408U is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H since it has less power consumption: 270W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 161 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 759 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 1693 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 957 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 4251 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U | | Single-Core | 15433 | 122 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 8325 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U | | Single-Core | 1270 | 786 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 7851 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | March 23, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 1.8 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Threads | 32 | 8 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 36000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 37% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Platinum 8444H has 8 more core than Xeon Bronze 3408U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U is better: 2
Although it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
