 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7473X |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7473X tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like RealBench, Furmark, PCMark 10, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, 7zip, AIDA64, WPrime, Handbrake, PassMark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7473X or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 7473X | 67% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 2% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 7473X | 74% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 130.7 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 148.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 83.2 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 139.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 111.4 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 120.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 102.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 74.3 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 115.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 124.8 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 123.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 7473X | 20% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7473X is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H as it consumes less power: 270W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7473X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 170 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 7201 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 322 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 15268 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 804 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 39707 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7473X | | Single-Core | 15433 | 1812 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 58245 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7473X | | Single-Core | 1270 | 1489 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 41864 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7473X | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | March 22, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 32 | 48 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 240 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 768MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000507
100-000000507​WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 3% better than EPYC 7473X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7473X has 8 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 23
Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 7473X before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
