 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7F32 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7F32 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, RealBench, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F32 or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 7F32 | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Platinum 8444H is 13% better than EPYC 7F32. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 7F32 | 61% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 108.2 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 122.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 68.8 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 115.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 92.2 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 99.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 84.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 61.5 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 95.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 103.3 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 102.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 7F32 | 22% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7F32 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H as it consumes less power: 270W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 67 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 2750 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 446 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 5829 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 308 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 15159 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | | Single-Core | 15433 | 2422 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 22236 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | | Single-Core | 1270 | 1209 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 19778 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | October 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Threads | 32 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 38000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 180 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000139
100-000000139WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F32 is 21% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Platinum 8444H has 8 more core than EPYC 7F32. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F32 is better: 4
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 7F32 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F32 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
