 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7773X |
|
Processor comparisons 27-04-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H vs AMD EPYC 7773X and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, PassMark, Gears 5, AIDA64, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, PCMark 10, RealBench, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7773X or Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 65% |
EPYC 7773X | 74% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 12% better than Xeon Platinum 8444H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 67% |
EPYC 7773X | 80% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.1 | 142.2 | | Valorant | 135.3 | 161.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.8 | 90.5 | | Apex Legends | 127.2 | 151.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 101.5 | 121.2 | | Overwatch | 109.6 | 130.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 93.4 | 111.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 67.6 | 80.8 | | Warzone | 105.5 | 126.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 113.6 | 135.7 | | Valheim | 112.3 | 134.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Platinum 8444H | 15% |
EPYC 7773X | 16% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7773X is more energy efficient than the Xeon Platinum 8444H since it has less power consumption: 270W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7773X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 1096 | 248 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3538 | 9889 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 2432 | 481 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8731 | 24485 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1693 | 1115 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49703 | 54474 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7773X | | Single-Core | 15433 | 2797 | | Multi-Core | 50595 | 79901 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7773X | | Single-Core | 1270 | 1385 | | Multi-Core | 30447 | 53124 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H |
AMD EPYC 7773X | | Announcement date | March 19, 2023 | March 22, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 4 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 32 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 270 W | 280 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 45 MB | 768MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Platinum 8444H is 24% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 48 more core than Xeon Platinum 8444H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 23
The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H and AMD EPYC 7773X before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8444H Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
