 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7443 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7443 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, MATLAB, WPrime, Prime95, SuperPi, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Blender, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7443 or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7443 is 12% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.8 | 113.3 | Valorant | 113.4 | 128.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 72.1 | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 121.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 96.6 | Overwatch | 91.9 | 104.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 88.9 | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 64.4 | Warzone | 88.5 | 100.5 | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 108.2 | Valheim | 94.1 | 106.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
EPYC 7443 | 22% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5415+ as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 6075 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 276 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 12876 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 680 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 33481 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 6191 | 1530 | Multi-Core | 20277 | 49112 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 986 | 1354 | Multi-Core | 11560 | 24852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.85 MHz | Cores | 8 | 24 | Threads | 16 | 48 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 62000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 200 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 1% better than EPYC 7443 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7443 has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 22 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 7443 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7443 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|