|
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7702P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7702P and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 7zip, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Furmark, Blender, Gears 5, WPrime. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7702P or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 7702P | 70% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7702P is 20% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 7702P | 80% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.8 | 141.7 | Valorant | 113.4 | 161.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 90.2 | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 151.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 120.8 | Overwatch | 91.9 | 130.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 111.1 | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 80.5 | Warzone | 88.5 | 125.6 | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 135.3 | Valheim | 94.1 | 133.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
EPYC 7702P | 18% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7702P since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7702P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 198 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 8182 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 370 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 18282 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 957 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 47555 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7702P | Single-Core | 6191 | 2135 | Multi-Core | 20277 | 66158 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7702P | Single-Core | 986 | 1086 | Multi-Core | 11560 | 52674 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 7702P | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.35 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 64 | Threads | 16 | 128 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 200 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000047 100-100000047WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 31% better than EPYC 7702P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7702P has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7702P is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 7702P before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7702P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|