 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Furmark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Blender, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Blender, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, AIDA64, PCMark 10.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ or Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 58% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Silver 4410Y is 3% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 65% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 114.4 | 99.8 | | Valorant | 130.0 | 113.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.8 | 63.5 | | Apex Legends | 122.2 | 106.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.5 | 85.0 | | Overwatch | 105.3 | 91.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.7 | 78.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 65.0 | 56.7 | | Warzone | 101.4 | 88.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 109.2 | 95.3 | | Valheim | 107.9 | 94.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 31% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410Y is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 5415+ as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 150W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 542 | 447 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2515 | 1426 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1292 | 983 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5597 | 3506 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3170 | 687 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14035 | 19920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 415 | 6191 | | Multi-Core | 27475 | 20277 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 1397 | 986 | | Multi-Core | 25909 | 11560 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Announcement date | March 17, 2023 | March 15, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 8 | | Threads | 24 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 38000 millions | 32000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 150 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 31% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Silver 4410Y has 4 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y and Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
