Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7642 gaming benchmark

Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7642

Processor comparisons   27-03-2023
   If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 7642 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PCMark 10, Handbrake, WPrime, PassMark, 7zip, AIDA64, Prime95, MATLAB, Gears 5, SuperPi, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Fallout 76
  • Fortnite
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valheim
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Borderlands 3
  • Apex Legends
  • Last Man Standing
  • Death Stranding
  • Overwatch
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Halo Infinite
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Valorant

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7642 or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.


 
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+
AMD EPYC 7642

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5415+56% EPYC 764268%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7642 is 17% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Xeon Gold 5415+56% EPYC 764273%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite99.8129.7
Valorant113.4147.3
Cyberpunk 207763.582.5
Apex Legends106.6138.5
Call of Duty Warzone85.0110.5
Overwatch91.9119.3
Red Dead Redemption 278.2101.7
DOOM Eternal56.773.7
Warzone88.5114.9
Assassin's Creed95.3123.8
Valheim94.1122.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5415+21% EPYC 764213%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ AMD EPYC 7642
Cinbench 15 Single-core447177
Cinbench 15 Multi-core14267594
Cinbench 20 Single-core983443
Cinbench 20 Multi-core350616104
Cinbench 23 Single-core687844
Cinbench 23 Multi-core1992041890

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ AMD EPYC 7642
Single-Core61912404
Multi-Core2027761546

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ AMD EPYC 7642
Single-Core986918
Multi-Core1156040836

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ AMD EPYC 7642
Announcement dateMarch 15, 2023October 01, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketFCLGA4677SP3
Core nameSapphire RapidsRome
Architecturex86Zen 2
Generation42
Turbo Frequency4.1 MHz3.3 MHz
Frequency2.9 MHz2.3 MHz
Cores848
Threads1696
Bus rate16 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count32000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)150 W225 W
Memory typeUp to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPCDDR4
Max. Memory4096 Gb
Memory Frequency3200
Memory bandwidth208 GByte/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache22.5 MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000074
100-100000074WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 20% better than EPYC 7642 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7642 has 40 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 23
   However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 7642 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7642 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands