 |
AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, Prime95, 7zip, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, PassMark, Gears 5, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Blender, 3DMark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, UserBenchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7473X | 67% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 16% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7473X | 74% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 130.7 | 99.8 | | Valorant | 148.5 | 113.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 63.5 | | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 106.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 85.0 | | Overwatch | 120.3 | 91.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 78.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 56.7 | | Warzone | 115.8 | 88.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 95.3 | | Valheim | 123.3 | 94.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7473X | 20% |
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7473X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 150W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 447 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 1426 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 983 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 3506 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 687 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 19920 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 1812 | 6191 | | Multi-Core | 58245 | 20277 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Single-Core | 1489 | 986 | | Multi-Core | 41864 | 11560 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Milan | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 8 | | Threads | 48 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 32000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 150 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000507
100-000000507​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 3% better than EPYC 7473X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7473X has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 10
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7473X and Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
