 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9654 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9654 and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip, AIDA64, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Furmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, MATLAB, Blender, VeraCrypt, WPrime.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9654 or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9654 is 43% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9654 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.8 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 113.4 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 91.9 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 88.5 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 94.1 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
EPYC 9654 | 13% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9654 since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 495 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 20361 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 930 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 43157 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 2281 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 112225 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 6191 | 4805 | | Multi-Core | 20277 | 164622 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Single-Core | 986 | 1502 | | Multi-Core | 11560 | 86274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9654 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 96 | | Threads | 16 | 192 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000789
100-100000789WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 5415+ is 17% better than EPYC 9654 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9654 has 88 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9654 is better: 26
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 9654 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9654 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
