 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9554P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9554P tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Prime95, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 7zip, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Furmark, MATLAB, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554P or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9554P | 87% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554P is 35% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9554P | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.8 | 155.1 | | Valorant | 113.4 | 176.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 98.7 | | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 165.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 132.2 | | Overwatch | 91.9 | 142.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 121.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 88.1 | | Warzone | 88.5 | 137.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 148.1 | | Valheim | 94.1 | 146.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
EPYC 9554P | 14% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 5415+ is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554P since it has less power consumption: 150W vs. 360W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 372 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 15207 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 697 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 32229 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 1705 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 83804 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 6191 | 3590 | | Multi-Core | 20277 | 122932 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Single-Core | 986 | 1540 | | Multi-Core | 11560 | 65817 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9554P | | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 64 | | Threads | 16 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000804
100-100000804WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554P is 6% better than Xeon Gold 5415+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554P has 56 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 26
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 9554P before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
