Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7443 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, 7zip, Geekbench 5.2, RealBench, SuperPi, MATLAB, Blender, WPrime, Furmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX or AMD EPYC 7443.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7443 | 72% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 91% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 20% better than EPYC 7443. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7443 | 71% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 81% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 126.4 | 144.2 | Valorant | 143.6 | 163.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 80.4 | 91.7 | Apex Legends | 135.0 | 154.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 107.7 | 122.9 | Overwatch | 116.4 | 132.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 99.1 | 113.0 | DOOM Eternal | 71.8 | 81.9 | Warzone | 112.0 | 127.8 | Assassin's Creed | 120.7 | 137.6 | Valheim | 119.2 | 136.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7443 | 22% |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | 15% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7443 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 147 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6075 | 11525 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 276 | 477 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 12876 | 24463 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 680 | 1231 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33481 | 73220 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1530 | 2691 | Multi-Core | 49112 | 89165 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Single-Core | 1354 | 1268 | Multi-Core | 24852 | 36342 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7443 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | July 14, 2020 | Type | Server | Desktop | Socket | SP3 | sTRX4 | Core name | Milan | Castle Peak | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.85 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 24 | 64 | Threads | 48 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 62000 millions | 22600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 4MB | L2 cache | | 32MB | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| 100-000000087
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7443 is 5% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 40 more core than EPYC 7443. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is better: 26 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7443 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r23 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r15 score • GeekBench 5 score • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-13900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7702 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Core i9-12900K Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900H Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Core i9-12900KF Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
|