|
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7443 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434H vs AMD EPYC 7443 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as AIDA64, 7zip, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7443 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 6434H | 62% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7443 is 3% better than Xeon Gold 6434H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 6434H | 64% |
EPYC 7443 | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.1 | 113.3 | Valorant | 128.5 | 128.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 72.1 | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 121.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 96.6 | Overwatch | 104.1 | 104.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.6 | 88.9 | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 64.4 | Warzone | 100.2 | 100.5 | Assassin's Creed | 107.9 | 108.2 | Valheim | 106.6 | 106.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 6434H | 27% |
EPYC 7443 | 22% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7443 since it has less power consumption: 195W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 886 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2879 | 6075 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1976 | 276 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7114 | 12876 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1374 | 680 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40535 | 33481 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 12581 | 1530 | Multi-Core | 41263 | 49112 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Single-Core | 1615 | 1354 | Multi-Core | 24562 | 24852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434H |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Announcement date | March 11, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.85 MHz | Cores | 8 | 24 | Threads | 16 | 48 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 62000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 200 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000342 100-100000342WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434H is 22% better than EPYC 7443 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7443 has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 6434H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434H is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7443 is better: 20 Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434H and AMD EPYC 7443 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434H Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7443 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|